- Bleak portrait of poverty is off the mark, experts say, By Jason DeParle, Robert Gebeloff and Sabrina Tavernise, November 3, 2011, New York Times: “When the Census Bureau said in September that the number of poor Americans had soared by 10 million to rates rarely seen in four decades, commentators called the report ‘shocking’ and ‘bleak.’ Most poverty experts would add another description: ‘flawed.’ Concocted on the fly a half-century ago, the official poverty measure ignores ever more of what is happening to the poor person’s wallet – good and bad. It overlooks hundreds of billions of dollars the needy receive in food stamps and other benefits and the similarly formidable amounts they lose to taxes and medical care. It even fails to note that rents are higher in places like Manhattan than they are in Mississippi. On Monday, that may start to change when the Census Bureau releases a long-promised alternate measure meant to do a better job of counting the resources the needy have and the bills they have to pay. Similar measures, quietly published in the past, suggest among other things that safety-net programs have played a large and mostly overlooked role in restraining hardship: as much as half of the reported rise in poverty since 2006 disappears…”
- To define poverty, US has a new (and improved?) formula, By Anna Mulrine, November 4, 2011, Christian Science Monitor: “How to get the clearest picture of who is poor in America? That’s a question poverty experts have grappled with for years – and years. At last, the Census Bureau is updating how it measures who’s poor and who’s not – aka the poverty line. Until this month, the poverty line has been calculated the same way for half a century. It was developed in 1964 as part of Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty. Ever since, a debate has ensued about how to determine who’s truly poor…”
Poverty-related issues in the news, from the Institute for Research on Poverty