Health Reforms in the US

Posted on October 18, 2011 by townsend

• Some states seek flexibility to push health-care overhaul further, By Sarah Kliff, October 16, 2011, Washington Post: “As far as health-reform boosters go, Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber is among the most stalwart. ‘We want to show that health reform is something real, that it actually works,’ he said. ‘Oregon is a place that can actually make it happen.’ His state has aggressively implemented the health overhaul Congress passed last year, taking more than $100 million in federal funding to do so. But at the same time, the health-care law puts Kitzhaber (D) in a bind. This year, Oregon passed its own plan, which starts with changing how it pays doctors and eventually ends with allowing public employees to enroll in Medicaid, the federal insurance program for low-income Americans. There’s just one big obstacle: What Oregon wants to do would require the Obama administration to waive integral pillars of its signature legislative accomplishment…”
• Administration seeks to roll back hospital rules, By Robert Pear, October 18, 2011, New York Times: “The Obama administration moved Tuesday to roll back a number of rules governing hospitals and other health care providers after concluding that the standards were obsolete or overly burdensome to the industry. Among other things, the proposals would allow hospitals to save money by sometimes using qualified nurse practitioners and physician assistants in place of better-paid doctors, allowing doctors to focus more on patients and helping address ‘impending physician shortages.’ Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, said the proposed changes would save providers nearly $1.1 billion a year without creating any ‘consequential risks for patients.’ The proposed rules would apply to more than 6,000 hospitals…”
• ‘Supercommittee’ decision may lead to cuts funding for public health initiatives, By Marilyn Werber Serafini, and Mary Agnes Carey and Kaiser Health News, October 16, 2011, Washington Post: “Federal funding for medical research, disease prevention and a host of public health initiatives could be sharply reduced if the congressional ‘supercommittee’ fails to agree on a deficit-reduction package, triggering automatic cuts. Public attention has largely focused on possible cuts to entitlement programs for seniors and the poor, Medicare and Medicaid, but health advocates are raising an alarm about many other smaller programs they say need to be protected…”